Articles | Volume 4, issue 1/2
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-4-19-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-4-19-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
30 Nov 2018
| 30 Nov 2018
Estimates of climate system properties incorporating recent climate change
Alex G. Libardoni
Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
now at: Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
Andrei P. Sokolov
Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Erwan Monier
Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
now at: Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
Related authors
Alex G. Libardoni, Chris E. Forest, Andrei P. Sokolov, and Erwan Monier
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3313–3325, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3313-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3313-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We present a transparent method for evaluating how changes to the MIT Earth System Model impact its response to anthropogenic and natural forcings. We tested the effects that changes to both model components and forcings have on the estimates of model parameters that agree with historical observations. Overall, changes to model forcings are more important than the new components, while the long-term model response is unchanged. The methodology serves as a guide for documenting model development.
Steven C. Sherwood and Chris E. Forest
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2679–2686, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2679-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2679-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The most fundamental parameter used to gauge the severity of future climate change is the so-called equilibrium climate sensitivity, which measures the warming that would ultimately occur due to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Due to recent advances it is now thought to probably lie in the range 2.5–4 °C. We discuss this and the issues involved in evaluating and using the number, pointing to some pitfalls in current efforts but also possibilities for further progress.
Andrew H. MacDougall, Thomas L. Frölicher, Chris D. Jones, Joeri Rogelj, H. Damon Matthews, Kirsten Zickfeld, Vivek K. Arora, Noah J. Barrett, Victor Brovkin, Friedrich A. Burger, Micheal Eby, Alexey V. Eliseev, Tomohiro Hajima, Philip B. Holden, Aurich Jeltsch-Thömmes, Charles Koven, Nadine Mengis, Laurie Menviel, Martine Michou, Igor I. Mokhov, Akira Oka, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Gary Shaffer, Andrei Sokolov, Kaoru Tachiiri, Jerry Tjiputra, Andrew Wiltshire, and Tilo Ziehn
Biogeosciences, 17, 2987–3016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2987-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2987-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Zero Emissions Commitment (ZEC) is the change in global temperature expected to occur following the complete cessation of CO2 emissions. Here we use 18 climate models to assess the value of ZEC. For our experiment we find that ZEC 50 years after emissions cease is between −0.36 to +0.29 °C. The most likely value of ZEC is assessed to be close to zero. However, substantial continued warming for decades or centuries following cessation of CO2 emission cannot be ruled out.
Alex G. Libardoni, Chris E. Forest, Andrei P. Sokolov, and Erwan Monier
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3313–3325, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3313-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3313-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We present a transparent method for evaluating how changes to the MIT Earth System Model impact its response to anthropogenic and natural forcings. We tested the effects that changes to both model components and forcings have on the estimates of model parameters that agree with historical observations. Overall, changes to model forcings are more important than the new components, while the long-term model response is unchanged. The methodology serves as a guide for documenting model development.
Benjamin Brown-Steiner, Noelle E. Selin, Ronald G. Prinn, Erwan Monier, Simone Tilmes, Louisa Emmons, and Fernando Garcia-Menendez
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8373–8388, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8373-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8373-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Detecting signals in observations and simulations of atmospheric chemistry is difficult due to the underlying variability in the chemistry, meteorology, and climatology. Here we examine the scale dependence of ozone variability and explore strategies for reducing or averaging this variability and thereby enhancing ozone signal detection capabilities. We find that 10–15 years of temporal averaging, and some level of spatial averaging, reduces the risk of overconfidence in ozone signals.
L. Xu, R. D. Pyles, K. T. Paw U, S. H. Chen, and E. Monier
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2917–2932, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2917-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2917-2014, 2014
E. Monier, J. R. Scott, A. P. Sokolov, C. E. Forest, and C. A. Schlosser
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 2063–2085, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-2063-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-2063-2013, 2013
M. Eby, A. J. Weaver, K. Alexander, K. Zickfeld, A. Abe-Ouchi, A. A. Cimatoribus, E. Crespin, S. S. Drijfhout, N. R. Edwards, A. V. Eliseev, G. Feulner, T. Fichefet, C. E. Forest, H. Goosse, P. B. Holden, F. Joos, M. Kawamiya, D. Kicklighter, H. Kienert, K. Matsumoto, I. I. Mokhov, E. Monier, S. M. Olsen, J. O. P. Pedersen, M. Perrette, G. Philippon-Berthier, A. Ridgwell, A. Schlosser, T. Schneider von Deimling, G. Shaffer, R. S. Smith, R. Spahni, A. P. Sokolov, M. Steinacher, K. Tachiiri, K. Tokos, M. Yoshimori, N. Zeng, and F. Zhao
Clim. Past, 9, 1111–1140, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1111-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1111-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Climate research
Spatial patterns and indices for heat waves and droughts over Europe using a decomposition of extremal dependency
Changes in the distribution of annual maximum temperatures in Europe
Evaluating skills and issues of quantile-based bias adjustment for climate change scenarios
Comparing climate time series – Part 4: Annual cycles
Statistical reconstruction of European winter snowfall in reanalysis and climate models based on air temperature and total precipitation
A multi-method framework for global real-time climate attribution
Analysis of the evolution of parametric drivers of high-end sea-level hazards
Comparing climate time series – Part 3: Discriminant analysis
Spatial heterogeneity in rain-bearing winds, seasonality and rainfall variability in southern Africa's winter rainfall zone
Spatial heterogeneity of 2015–2017 drought intensity in South Africa's winter rainfall zone
A statistical framework for integrating nonparametric proxy distributions into geological reconstructions of relative sea level
A machine learning approach to emulation and biophysical parameter estimation with the Community Land Model, version 5
A protocol for probabilistic extreme event attribution analyses
The effect of geographic sampling on evaluation of extreme precipitation in high-resolution climate models
A new energy-balance approach to linear filtering for estimating effective radiative forcing from temperature time series
Robust regional clustering and modeling of nonstationary summer temperature extremes across Germany
Possible impacts of climate change on fog in the Arctic and subpolar North Atlantic
Approaches to attribution of extreme temperature and precipitation events using multi-model and single-member ensembles of general circulation models
Comparison and assessment of large-scale surface temperature in climate model simulations
Future climate emulations using quantile regressions on large ensembles
Downscaling probability of long heatwaves based on seasonal mean daily maximum temperatures
The joint influence of break and noise variance on the break detection capability in time series homogenization
A space–time statistical climate model for hurricane intensification in the North Atlantic basin
Building a traceable climate model hierarchy with multi-level emulators
Svenja Szemkus and Petra Friederichs
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 10, 29–49, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-10-29-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-10-29-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper uses the tail pairwise dependence matrix (TPDM) proposed by Cooley and Thibaud (2019), which we extend to the description of common extremes in two variables. We develop an extreme pattern index (EPI), a pattern-based aggregation to describe spatially extended weather extremes. Our results show that the EPI is suitable for describing heat waves. We extend the EPI to describe extremes in two variables and obtain an index to describe compound precipitation deficits and heat waves.
Graeme Auld, Gabriele C. Hegerl, and Ioannis Papastathopoulos
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 9, 45–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-9-45-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-9-45-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we consider the problem of detecting changes in the distribution of the annual maximum temperature, during the years 1950–2018, across Europe.
We find that, on average, the temperature that would be expected to be exceeded
approximately once every 100 years in the 1950 climate is expected to be exceeded once every 6 years in the 2018 climate. This is of concern due to the devastating effects on humans and natural systems that are caused by extreme temperatures.
Fabian Lehner, Imran Nadeem, and Herbert Formayer
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 9, 29–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-9-29-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-9-29-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Climate model output has systematic errors which can be reduced with statistical methods. We review existing bias-adjustment methods for climate data and discuss their skills and issues. We define three demands for the method and then evaluate them using real and artificially created daily temperature and precipitation data for Austria to show how biases can also be introduced with bias-adjustment methods themselves.
Timothy DelSole and Michael K. Tippett
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 187–203, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-187-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-187-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most climate time series contain annual and diurnal cycles. However, an objective criterion for deciding whether two time series have statistically equivalent annual and diurnal cycles is lacking, particularly if the residual variability is serially correlated. Such a criterion would be helpful in deciding whether a new version of a climate model better simulates such cycles. This paper derives an objective rule for such decisions based on a rigorous statistical framework.
Flavio Maria Emanuele Pons and Davide Faranda
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 155–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-155-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-155-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The objective motivating this study is the assessment of the impacts of winter climate extremes, which requires accurate simulation of snowfall. However, climate simulation models contain physical approximations, which result in biases that must be corrected using past data as a reference. We show how to exploit simulated temperature and precipitation to estimate snowfall from already bias-corrected variables, without requiring the elaboration of complex, multivariate bias adjustment techniques.
Daniel M. Gilford, Andrew Pershing, Benjamin H. Strauss, Karsten Haustein, and Friederike E. L. Otto
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 135–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-135-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-135-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a framework to produce global real-time estimates of how human-caused climate change affects the likelihood of daily weather events. A multi-method approach provides ensemble attribution estimates accompanied by confidence intervals, creating new opportunities for climate change communication. Methodological efficiency permits daily analysis using forecasts or observations. Applications with daily maximum temperature highlight the framework's capacity on daily and global scales.
Alana Hough and Tony E. Wong
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 117–134, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-117-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-117-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We use machine learning to assess how different geophysical uncertainties relate to the severity of future sea-level rise. We show how the contributions to coastal hazard from different sea-level processes evolve over time and find that near-term sea-level hazards are driven by thermal expansion and the melting of glaciers and ice caps, while long-term hazards are driven by ice loss from the major ice sheets.
Timothy DelSole and Michael K. Tippett
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 97–115, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-97-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-97-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A common problem in climate studies is to decide whether a climate model is realistic. Such decisions are not straightforward because the time series are serially correlated and multivariate. Part II derived a test for deciding wether a simulation is statistically distinguishable from observations. However, the test itself provides no information about the nature of those differences. This paper develops a systematic and optimal approach to diagnosing differences between stochastic processes.
Willem Stefaan Conradie, Piotr Wolski, and Bruce Charles Hewitson
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 31–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-31-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-31-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Cape Town is situated in a small but ecologically and climatically highly diverse and vulnerable pocket of South Africa uniquely receiving its rain mostly in winter. We show complex structures in the spatial patterns of rainfall seasonality and year-to-year changes in rainfall within this domain, tied to spatial differences in the rain-bearing winds. This allows us to develop a new spatial subdivision of the region to help future studies distinguish spatially distinct climate change responses.
Willem Stefaan Conradie, Piotr Wolski, and Bruce Charles Hewitson
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 63–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-63-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-63-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The
Day Zerowater crisis affecting Cape Town after the severe 2015–2017 drought motivated renewed research interest into causes and projections of rainfall variability and change in this water-stressed region. Unusually few wet months and very wet days characterised the Day Zero Drought. Its extent expanded as it shifted gradually north-eastward, concurrent with changes in the weather systems driving drought. Our results emphasise the need to consider the interplay between drought drivers.
Erica L. Ashe, Nicole S. Khan, Lauren T. Toth, Andrea Dutton, and Robert E. Kopp
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 8, 1–29, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a new technique to integrate realistic uncertainties in probabilistic models of past sea-level change. The new framework performs better than past methods (in precision, accuracy, bias, and model fit) because it enables the incorporation of previously unused data and exploits correlations in the data. This method has the potential to assess the validity of past estimates of extreme sea-level rise and highstands providing better context in which to place current sea-level change.
Katherine Dagon, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Rosie A. Fisher, and David M. Lawrence
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 223–244, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-223-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-223-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Uncertainties in land model projections are important to understand in order to build confidence in Earth system modeling. In this paper, we introduce a framework for estimating uncertain land model parameters with machine learning. This method increases the computational efficiency of this process relative to traditional hand tuning approaches and provides objective methods to assess the results. We further identify key processes and parameters that are important for accurate land modeling.
Sjoukje Philip, Sarah Kew, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Friederike Otto, Robert Vautard, Karin van der Wiel, Andrew King, Fraser Lott, Julie Arrighi, Roop Singh, and Maarten van Aalst
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 177–203, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-177-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-177-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Event attribution studies can now be performed at short notice. We document a protocol developed by the World Weather Attribution group. It includes choices of which events to analyse, the event definition, observational analysis, model evaluation, multi-model multi-method attribution, hazard synthesis, vulnerability and exposure analysis, and communication procedures. The protocol will be useful for future event attribution studies and as a basis for an operational attribution service.
Mark D. Risser and Michael F. Wehner
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 115–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-115-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-115-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Evaluation of modern high-resolution global climate models often does not account for the geographic location of the underlying weather station data. In this paper, we quantify the impact of geographic sampling on the relative performance of climate model representations of precipitation extremes over the United States. We find that properly accounting for the geographic sampling of weather stations can significantly change the assessment of model performance.
Donald P. Cummins, David B. Stephenson, and Peter A. Stott
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 91–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-91-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-91-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a novel and fast statistical method for diagnosing effective radiative forcing (ERF), a measure of the net effect of greenhouse gas emissions on Earth's energy budget. Our method works by inverting a recursive digital filter energy balance representation of global climate models and has been successfully validated using simulated data from UK Met Office climate models. We have estimated time series of historical ERF by applying our method to the global temperature record.
Meagan Carney and Holger Kantz
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 61–77, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-61-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-61-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Extremes in weather can have lasting effects on human health and resource consumption. Studying the recurrence of these events on a regional scale can improve response times and provide insight into a changing climate. We introduce a set of clustering tools that allow for regional clustering of weather recordings from stations across Germany. We use these clusters to form regional models of summer temperature extremes and find an increase in the mean from 1960 to 2018.
Richard E. Danielson, Minghong Zhang, and William A. Perrie
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 31–43, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-31-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-31-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Visibility is estimated for the 21st century using global and regional climate model output. A baseline decrease in visibility in the Arctic (10 %) is more notable than in the North Atlantic (< 5 %). We develop an adjustment that yields greater consistency among models and explore the justification of our ad hoc adjustment toward ship observations during the historical period. Baseline estimates are found to be sensitive to the representation of temperature and humidity.
Sophie C. Lewis, Sarah E. Perkins-Kirkpatrick, and Andrew D. King
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 5, 133–146, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-5-133-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-5-133-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme temperature and precipitation events in Australia have caused significant socio-economic and environmental impacts. Determining the factors contributing to these extremes is an active area of research. This paper describes a set of studies that have examined the causes of extreme climate events in recent years in Australia. Ideally, this review will be useful for the application of these extreme event attribution approaches to climate and weather extremes occurring elsewhere.
Raquel Barata, Raquel Prado, and Bruno Sansó
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 5, 67–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-5-67-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-5-67-2019, 2019
Matz A. Haugen, Michael L. Stein, Ryan L. Sriver, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 5, 37–55, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-5-37-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-5-37-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This work uses current temperature observations combined with climate models to project future temperature estimates, e.g., 100 years into the future. We accomplish this by modeling temperature as a smooth function of time both in the seasonal variation as well as in the annual trend. These smooth functions are estimated at multiple quantiles that are all projected into the future. We hope that this work can be used as a template for how other climate variables can be projected into the future.
Rasmus E. Benestad, Bob van Oort, Flavio Justino, Frode Stordal, Kajsa M. Parding, Abdelkader Mezghani, Helene B. Erlandsen, Jana Sillmann, and Milton E. Pereira-Flores
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 4, 37–52, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-4-37-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-4-37-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
A new study indicates that heatwaves in India will become more frequent and last longer with global warming. Its results were derived from a large number of global climate models, and the calculations differed from previous studies in the way they included advanced statistical theory. The projected changes in the Indian heatwaves will have a negative consequence for wheat crops in India.
Ralf Lindau and Victor Karel Christiaan Venema
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 4, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-4-1-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-4-1-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Climate data contain spurious breaks, e.g., by relocation of stations, which makes it difficult to infer the secular temperature trend. Homogenization algorithms use the difference time series of neighboring stations to detect and eliminate this spurious break signal. For low signal-to-noise ratios, i.e., large distances between stations, the correct break positions may not only remain undetected, but segmentations explaining mainly the noise can be erroneously assessed as significant and true.
Erik Fraza, James B. Elsner, and Thomas H. Jagger
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 2, 105–114, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-105-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-105-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Climate influences on hurricane intensification are investigated by averaging hourly intensification rates over the period 1975–2014 in 8° by 8° latitude–longitude grid cells. The statistical effects of hurricane intensity, sea-surface temperature (SST), El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), and the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) are quantified. Intensity, SST, and NAO had a positive effect on intensification rates. The NAO effect should be further studied.
Giang T. Tran, Kevin I. C. Oliver, András Sóbester, David J. J. Toal, Philip B. Holden, Robert Marsh, Peter Challenor, and Neil R. Edwards
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 2, 17–37, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-17-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-17-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we combine the information from a complex and a simple atmospheric model to efficiently build a statistical representation (an emulator) of the complex model and to study the relationship between them. Thanks to the improved efficiency, this process is now feasible for complex models, which are slow and costly to run. The constructed emulator provide approximations of the model output, allowing various analyses to be made without the need to run the complex model again.
Cited articles
Andrews, D. G. and Allen, M. R.: Diagnosis of climate models in terms of
transient climate response and feedback response time, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 9,
7–12, 2008. a
Andronova, N. G. and Schlesinger, M. E.: Objective estimation of the
probability density function for climate sensitivity, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
22605–22612, 2001. a
Bayes, T.: An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances,
Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 53, 370–418, 1763. a
Bindoff, N. L., Stott, P. A., AchutaRao, K. M., Allen, M. R., Gillett, N.,
Gutzler, D., Hansingo, K., Hegerl, G., Gu, Y., Jain, S., Mokhov, I. I.,
Overland, J., Perlwitz, J., Sebbari, R., and Zhang, X.: Detection and
attribution of climate change: From global to regional, in: Climate Change
2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the
Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
edited by: Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P., 867–952,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013. a
Brohan, P., Kennedy, J. J., Harris, I., Tett, S. F. B., and Jones, P. D.:
Unceratainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes:
A new data set from 1850, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12106,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006548, 2006. a
Collins, M. M. R. K., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Fichefet, T.,
Friedlingstein, P., Gao, X., Gutowski, W., Johns, T., Krinner, G., Shongwe,
M., Tebaldi, C., Weaver, A., and Wehner, M.: Long-term climate change:
Projections, commitments and irreversibility, in: Climate Change 2013: The
Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited
by: Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S., Boschung, J.,
Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P., 1029–1136, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013. a
Cowtan, K. and Way, R. G.: Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series
and its impact on recent temperature trends, Q. J. Roy. Meterol. Soc., 140,
1935–1944, 2014. a
Forest, C. E., Allen, M. R., Sokolov, A. P., and Stone, P. H.: Constraining
climate model properties using optimal fingerprint detection methods., Clim.
Dynam., 18, 277–295, 2001. a
Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R., and Webster, M. D.:
Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent
climate observations, Science, 295, 113–117, 2002. a
Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., and Sokolov, A. P.: Estimated PDFs of climate
system properties including natural and anthropogenic forcings, Geophys. Res.
Let., 33, L01705, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023977, 2006. a, b, c, d
Gent, P. R., Danabasoglu, G., Donner, L. J., Holland, M. M., Hunke, E. C.,
Jayne, S. R., Lawrence, D. M., Neale, R. B., Rasch, P. J., Vertenstein, M.,
Worley, P. H., Yang, Z.-L., and Zhang, M.: The Community Climate System
Model Version 4, J. Climate, 24, 4973–4991, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1, 2011. a
Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., and Lo, K.: Global surface temperature change,
Rev. Geophys., 48, RG4004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000345, 2010. a
Huang, B., Banzon, V. F., Freeman, E., Lawrimore, J., Liu, W., Peterson, T. C.,
Thorne, T. M. S. P. W., Woodruff, S. D., and Zhang, H.-M.: Extended
Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature Version 4 (ERSST.v4). Part I:
Upgrades and intercomparisons, J. Climate, 28, 911–930, 2015. a
Karl, T., Arguez, A., Huang, B., Lawrimore, J., McMahon, J., Menne, M.,
Peterson, T., Vose, R., and Zhang, H.-M.: Possible artifacts of data biases
in the recent global surface warming hiatus, Science, 348, 1469–1472, 2015. a
Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., Smith, R. O., Parker, D. E., and Saunby, M.:
Reassessing biases and other uncertainties in sea surface temperature
observations measured in situ since 1850: 1. Measurement and
sampling uncertainties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D14103,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015218, 2011a. a
Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., Smith, R. O., Parker, D. E., and Saunby, M.:
Reassessing biases and other uncertainties in sea surface temperature
observations measured in situ since 1850: 2. Biases and
homogenization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D14104,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015220, 2011b. a
Knutti, R. and Tomassini, L.: Constraints on the transient climate response
from observed global temperature and ocean heat uptake, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
35, L09701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032904, 2008. a
Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., and Plattner, G.-K.: Constraints on
radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate
model ensembles, Nature, 416, 719–723, 2002. a
Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., and Plattner, G.: Probabilistic climate
change projections using neural networks, Clim. Dynam., 21, 257–272, 2003. a
Levitus, S., Antonov, J., and Boyer, T.: Warming of the world ocean,
1955–2003, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L02604,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021592, 2005. a, b
Levitus, S., Antonov, J. I., Boyer, T. P., Baranova, O. K., Garcia, H. E.,
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., Yarosh, E. S.,
and Zweng, M. M.: World ocean heat content and thermosteric sea level change
(0–2000 m), 1955–2010, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L10603,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051106, 2012. a, b, c, d, e, f
Lewis, N.: An objective Bayesian improved approach for applying optimal
fingerprint techniques to climate sensitivity, J. Climate, 26,
7414–7429, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00473.1, 2013. a
Libardoni, A. G. and Forest, C. E.: Sensitivity of distributions of climate
system properties to the surface temperature dataset, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
L22705, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049431, 2011. a, b, c, d
Libardoni, A. G. and Forest, C. E.: Correction to ”Sensitivity of
distributions of climate system properties to the surface temperature data
set”, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2309–2311, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50480, 2013. a, b, c, d
Libardoni, A., Forest, C., Sokolov, A., and Monier, E.: Underestimating
internal variability leads to narrow estimates of climate system properties,
in preparation, 2018b. a
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J.: A comparison of three methods
for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a
computer code, Technometrics, 21, 239–245, 1979. a
Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S., Frieler, K., Knutti, R.,
Frame, D., and Allen, M.: Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global
warming to 2 degrees C, Nature, 458, 1158–1162, 2009. a
Morice, C. P., Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., and Jones, P. D.: Quantifying
uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of
observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 data set, J. Geohpys. Res., 117,
D08101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017187, 2012. a
Olson, R., Sriver, R., Goes, M., Urban, N. M., Matthews, H. D., Haran, M., and
Keller, K.: A climate sensitivity estimate using Bayesian fusion of
instrumental observations and an Earth System model, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D04103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016620, 2012. a, b, c, d
Powell, M. J. D.: Restart procedures for the conjugate gradient method, Math.
Prog., 12, 241–254, 1977. a
Rohde, R., Muller, R. A., Jacobsen, R., Muller, E., Perlmutter, S., Rosenfeld,
A., Wurtele, J., Groom, D., and Wickham, C.: A new estimate of the average
Earth surface and land temperature spanning 1753 to 2011, Geoinfor.
Geostat: An Overview, 1:1, https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-4581.1000101, 2013. a
Sansó, B. and Forest, C.: Statistical calibration of climate system
properties, Appl. Statist., 58, 485–503, 2009. a
Skeie, R. B., Berntsen, T., Aldrin, M., Holden, M., and Myhre, G.: A lower
and more constrained estimate of climate sensitivity using updated
observations and detailed radiative forcing time series, Earth Syst. Dynam.,
5, 139–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-139-2014, 2014. a
Sokolov, A., Schlosser, C., Dutkiewicz, S., Paltsev, S., Kicklighter, D.,
Jacoby, H., Prinn, R., Forest, C., Reilly, J., Wang, C., Felzer, B., Sarofim,
M., Scott, J., Stone, P., Melillo, J., and Cohen, J.: The MIT Integrated
Global System Model (IGSM) Version 2: Model description and baseline
evaluation, Joint Program Report Series, Report 124, 40 pp., 2005. a
Sokolov, A., Kicklighter, D., Schlosser, A., Wang, C., Monier, E.,
Brown-Steiner, B., Prinn, R., Forest, C., Gao, X., Libardoni, A., and
Eastham, S.: Description and evaluation of the MIT Earth System Model
(MESM), J. Adv. Model Earth Syst., 10, 1759–1789, 2018. a
Sokolov, A. P., Forest, C. E., and Stone, P. H.: Comparing oceanic heat uptake
in AOGCM transient climate change experiments, J. Climate, 16, 1573–1582,
2003. a
Trenberth, K. E. and Fasullo, J. T.: An apparent hiatus in global warming?,
Earth's Future, 1, 19–32, 2013. a
Urban, N. M. and Keller, K.: Complementary observational constraints on climate
sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L04708,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036457, 2009. a, b
Vose, R. S., Arndt, D., Banzon, V. F., Easterling, D. R., Gleason, B., Huang,
B., Kearns, E., Lawrimore, J. H., Menne, M. J., Peterson, T. C., Reynolds,
R. W., Smith, T. M., Williams Jr., C. N., and Wuertz, D. B.:
NOAA's merged land–ocean surface temperature analysis,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 1677–1685, 2012. a
Webster, M. and Sokolov, A.: A methodology for quantifying uncertainty in
climate projections, Clim. Change, 46, 417–446, 2000. a
Short summary
We present new probabilistic estimates of model parameters in the MIT Earth System Model using more recent data and an updated method. Model output is compared to observed climate change to determine which sets of model parameters best simulate the past. In response to increasing surface temperatures and accelerated heat storage in the ocean, our estimates of climate sensitivity and ocean diffusivity are higher. Using a new interpolation algorithm results in smoother probability distributions.
We present new probabilistic estimates of model parameters in the MIT Earth System Model using...
